Differences Between Government Contracts And Commercial Contracts

Contracting with the United States government is very much like commercial contracting, yet is quite different in that there are special procedures and protocol. Whereas commercial contracts involve two or more parties that are each free to renegotiate contracts and reach levels of compromise, government contracts are much more rigid. The basic reason behind the rigidity of government contracts is that the government is acting for the entirety of its citizens.

The authority of a governmental contracting officer is to contract with businesses on behalf of the United States government as set forth in the U.S. Constitution and all records are available for public review.

Government contracting can be very profitable if you can learn about how to handle the special protocol and paperwork and, with the current administration in particular, if you know the right people. For example, Haliburton and various other corporate chums of the Bush administration have raked in excess billions of dollars in Iraq and other Middle East countries, while cutting out other bidders and

Are Ohio Voters Jus' a Buncha Dumb Hayseeds? Ohio Election Justice Campaign (OEJC) Declares Need for Voter Independence
Recent research by Ohio Election Justice Campaign reveals over 800 pages of documents on destruction of 2004 ballots in violation of court order not submitted to the court, contrary to quoted comments in minutes of meeting of Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner with numerous election officials and voting rights leaders. These records are evidence in a federal lawsuit. OEJC calls upon all patriots to commemorate our great nation's independence from King George's tyranny, including his denial of elections, to demand election justice in Ohio and across the nation. (PRWeb Jul 4, 2008)